The story of Pinocchio was first written by Carlo Collodi in
the 19th century as a children’s book to encourage conduct that
would ensure Italian unity. Pinocchio, like many epic heroes, descends into
hell and is revived by metamorphosis. In
the story’s original version, Pinocchio suffers a tragic death in which his enemies,
a fox and a cat, hang him by a noose and a tempestuous wind comes and
repeatedly knocks him against various structures until the life is knocked out
of him.
Since its genesis, the story of Pinocchio has gone through
many metamorphoses. Some have tragic
endings. Some have happy endings. Logically speaking, I suppose the ending is
simply a function of the one telling the tale.
Interestingly enough, the story teller has the free will to end the
story any way he likes. I’m most
familiar with the Disney version, but I presume that all versions have certain
elements in common… a marionette capable of exercising free will and in the
process, displaying character flaws which get him into all sorts of
difficulties. I posit that it is as good
a metaphor as any to attempt to explain the relationship between God and man.
According to the Disney version, Pinocchio was a marionette
skillfully carved by the hands of an elderly craftsman by the name of
Gepetto. I ask, rhetorically, what is
it that characterizes marionettes?
Marionettes are lifeless, pieces of wood having some semblance, in
appearance, of the conceptualizations of their creator. Their movements are orchestrated and
completely under the control of the puppeteer who pulls their strings.
Such was Pinocchio, a lifeless puppet who hung in a closet
until Gepetto saw fit to take him out, dust him off and pull his strings. But Gepetto longed for a real boy… a boy whom
he could raise and call “son” and teach and talk to and with whom he could share
the world. And so a fairy comes, and
with the help of special magic converts a lifeless pile of wood into a living
being capable of thought, speech and self-animation.
Gepetto loves Pinocchio, but the new, living Pinocchio has
other ideas. Rather than living in
loving repose with his creator, he disdains the warm, fatherly Gepetto and
chooses to explore the world on his own.
Collodi’s as well as Disney’s version of the story reveal a loveable
puppet with, nevertheless, serious character flaws. Pinocchio yields to all sorts of temptations
and finds himself in the midst of myriads of misadventures which place his very
survival in peril. Having made a
plethora of wrong choices he finds himself in predicaments that tempt him to
lie in order to extricate himself.
Obligingly, he does lie and with each lie, his nose grows longer.
I don’t recall the entire Disney rendition of this tale, but
if I remember correctly, unlike the Collodi account, in true Disney fashion,
our hero winds up back in the loving arms of Gepetto and the two live happily
ever after.
I write this essay because a question was presented to me on
twitter... in so many words, “How can you say that a loving God created man
with original sin?” My response is “God
did not create man with original sin. He created man with free will”. Like Gepetto, creating Pinocchio out of a
block of wood, God created man out of dust.
Like the fairy, through magic, giving life to that block of wood, God,
through His “magic” as it were, took about 50 cents worth of apparently random chemicals (most of which is simply good ole' fashioned water) and gave them life.
This life possessing creature that we call “man” is
amazing. He’s able to explore the
intricacies of the ribosomes and mitochondria and glycoproteins and all the
other intricacies that comprise amazing mechanisms within each cell that make
up living organisms but he still can’t get to the essence of the source of this
animation. All of those structures could just as likely be intact but remain lifeless. Like Pinocchio man has sought to exercise his
free will and, rather than enjoy the loving relationship available to him with
his creator, venture out on his own in search of pleasures that he assumes will
fulfill his desires. Like Pinocchio,
man’s spiritual nose grows long as he accumulates over the course of his life
the lies and deceptions in which he indulges himself as he, in pursuit of
happiness, spurns the love of the God who both, fashioned him and gave him
life.
Like Gepetto, God chose to free this puppet that we call
“man” from his strings so that the man could willfully and independently make the choice to love
his creator. After all, how loving is it
to demand of someone “love me”? The
first inclination is for that someone to pursue the opposite of the desired
result. Hence, the “strings” of man were
removed. He was given the free will to
choose to love God and make the right choices.
History has shown us that man has, with little exception, made
wrong choices. He chooses to love
himself, or his creations or achievements or his desires more than his
creator. And so, we live in a world
permeated by hate, distrust, self-indulgence, self-centeredness and confusion. Even the motives of a man’s altruistic tendencies are suspect.
But God made a “puppet” that was unique. This puppet had the very same will and
desires that God had. This “puppet”
exercised His free will to wholeheartedly love the one from whom he’d
come. This puppets nose never grew
because he never had to hide secrets.
This puppet served as an example to show how all the other “puppets”
ought to be and this “puppet” died so as to draw all of the other “puppets”
back into the loving arms of their creator.
The creator gives you the free will to read my story. He gives you the free will to consider my
words. He gives you the free will to
accept or reject my words. He gives you
the free will to love your creator, but above all, he gives you free will to
choose. The choice is entirely yours.
In the words of the guardian of the holy grail in an Indiana Jones movie (hopefully you're familiar with it) "choose wisely".
I wish you the best my friend.
No comments:
Post a Comment