Playing A Game Of Chicken With "Imigrants"

Well, boys and girls, it looks like it’s time to play “chicken.”

For those of you who are unfamiliar with the game, more often than not, it’s played by two idiots or teams of idiots driving cars at a billion miles per hour towards each other from opposite directions. The first car to get out of the way of the otherwise inevitable collision loses. Sometimes both drivers win by crashing into each other and, by so doing, killing each other. I suppose one might facetiously say, in that case, both parties lost by winning.

I do not speak from expertise, having never played the game myself, but it seems to me that it would be considerably easier to play chicken when the person playing the game has nothing to risk.

Seemingly that appears to be the case. A different game of chicken is playing out at the USA southern border with Mexico. However, it seems that the ones who stand most to gain or lose are alleged migrants from Central America. There is no doubt that someone paid for the transportation, food, and shelter for thousands of these people who are supposedly fleeing from hardship in their home countries. This writer also does not doubt that this crisis began as a purposely coordinated effort between planners, organizers, and financiers. This writer also does not doubt that this coordinated effort under discussion promotes a globalist agenda whereby international boundaries between nations can be destroyed and by so doing, establish a one world government.

And so, a game of chicken has been set up with Globalists on one side of the game and Nationalists on the other side of the “game.” And sadly, the ones most likely to lose are many hapless immigrant pawns at the hands of the Globalists.

EVIL EXPLOITS PEOPLE AS PAWNS BY WHICH IT CAN ACCOMPLISH ITS PURPOSES. To evil (the noun), human life is expendable. Hence, the “immigrants” coming to the USA southern border are pawns. Globalists are betting that the Nationalists will appear as the bad guys in this standoff. Hence, they’re assuming that the Nationalists will be the first to flinch in this game of chicken. In the meantime, many of the immigrants, who, although they might not meet the status of refugees, are nevertheless understandably seeking a better life for themselves. They were persuaded that a new and better life is available to them in the United States. The veracity of the lie they’ve been fed hinges upon whether or not the various elements among the globalists can badger the Nationalists, headed by President Trump into allowing these “immigrants” in.

As I see it, with perhaps some exceptions, there are three types of Americans engaged in this “game of chicken.” The Globalists are largely politicians and liberals who believe in globalism, have established it as their goal and don’t appreciate the uniqueness of the USA Constitution and history. The Nationalists do believe in the uniqueness of the United States and believe it as a force for good. They also believe that Globalism is dangerous. Those who specifically don’t have an agenda, the third group, will likely express grave concern for the well-being of these poor “immigrant” pawns held in limbo.

The strategy of the Globalists is to distract the populace from the main issue of Globalism vs. Nationalism and place attention on the plight of the “immigrants.” It is elements within their ranks that are responsible for persuading immigrants and paying for their travel. Furthermore, undoubtedly, corruption in their homelands contributed to these people wanting to migrate in the first place.

With their allies in the media, the Globalists can downplay the corruption in foreign countries and their complicity in facilitating the impetus for migration. They can continue their incessant droning that Trump, who stands at the vanguard of the Nationalist cause, is a “misogynist, homophobe and, above all, a racist who hates Hispanics and Muslims” and doesn’t want them in the country. Also with the help of the media, they can try to persuade their audience into believing that everyone who supports the Trump agenda is, likewise, a “misogynist, homophobe and, above all, racist who hates Hispanics and Muslims.”

I would argue that the effort of the Nationalists is to persuade people that Globalism is dangerous and will lead to a world-wide dictatorship will be detrimental to the well-being of everyone world-wide except for the elite dictators at the top of the political pecking order.

In the end, concerning this “game of chicken,” somebody’s got to flinch eventually, and even after then, evil will continue to exploit people as expendable pawns in its effort to implement Globalism.